The USFS battles fires and a fire analysis

Whitewater-Baldy fire

Whitewater-Baldy fire, June 6, 2012. Photo by Kari Greer for the USFS

Since Congress instructed the five federal land management agencies in 2001 to work together to pool their dollars and firefighting resources, not much has actually occurred toward accomplishing that goal. The objective was to allocate fire management budgets in locations with the greatest need, enhancing efficiency. This would mean reducing the money going to areas with low fire occurrence, and transferring those excess funds to underfunded areas with a higher incidence of fires.

The agencies paid a forest economics professor, Douglas Rideout, to develop a computer model that would, if not make decisions about where to allocate fire funds, at least provide information to enable managers to redistribute dollars. While the first version of the model called Fire Program Analysis (FPA) died a painful death, a revised edition is now being considered by fire managers for the US Forest Service, National Park Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

An article in the Denver Post states that the U.S. Forest Service was unwilling to face politicians who had firefighting budgets reduced in their states. The article appears to be very well researched, and quotes some people who were very involved with the FPA, including Steve Botti, the retired fire budget guru for the National Park Service, and Chester Joy, a retired U.S. Government Accountability Office natural resources expert.

Here is an excerpt from the article.

Joy, the retired GAO expert, said the initiative “got strangled in the crib.”

He said the Forest Service was unwilling to take on Sen. Ted Stevens, the Alaska Republican who served as chairman of the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee.

In Interior, “the Bureau of Land Management was on board. The BLM was willing to do it. The Forest Service sunk it,” Joy said. “The Forest Service responded, ‘There’s no way we’re taking this to the Hill. There’s no way.’ And that was the beginning of the end.”

 

Thanks go out to Gary

Share
This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Bill Gabbert. Bookmark the permalink.

About Bill Gabbert

Wildland fire has been a major part of Bill Gabbert’s life for several decades. After growing up in the south, he migrated to southern California where he lived for 20 years, working as a wildland firefighter. Later he took his affinity for firefighting to Indiana and eventually the Black Hills of South Dakota where he was the Fire Management Officer for a group of seven national parks. Today he is the creator and owner of WildfireToday.com and Sagacity Wildfire Services and serves as an expert witness in wildland fire. If you are interested in wildland fire, welcome… grab a cup of coffee and put your feet up. Google+

2 thoughts on “The USFS battles fires and a fire analysis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>