Thousands of FEMA fire grants, too little time

Over 300 senior level firefighters spent four days this week holed up in a large meeting room west of Washington, DC. They were helping the Federal Emergency Management Agency review thousands of applications received from fire departments and EMS organizations for the Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG) and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants (SAFER).

Approximately 15,000 to 20,000 applications for AFG funding alone were submitted electronically. They were all reviewed and graded by computers using criteria developed by FEMA. Then the ones that made it through the basic screening were all printed and given to the firefighters for peer review. The computerized technical review and the peer review each make up half of the final score.

The 300 firefighters reviewing the AFG grants were organized into groups of six people at each table, and were given packets of six applications at a time. Every application was reviewed by three evaluators who read the 20 to 35 page document and then wrote by hand their analysis, addressing four categories on a 2-page form.  If the scores among the three evaluators varied too much, they had to discuss it, and either change their scores to come closer into alignment, or write a statement on the scoring form saying it was discussed and no changes were made. Every table of firefighters reviewed 36 to 60 applications each day.

The firefighters reviewing the SAFER grants may have had a different procedure.

The SAFER grants may have all been reviewed, but the firefighters handling the AFG grants worked from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. for four days, Monday through Thursday, and at the end of the day on Thursday there was still a large pile of AFG applications pending.  The FEMA personnel asked for volunteers to work further into Thursday night, and may have even asked some to volunteer Friday morning before they had to get on the shuttle to the airport. It is unlikely that all of the applications got reviewed, and FEMA will have to come up with a plan to finish them, possibly bringing another group of firefighters to Washington.

This year, fiscal 2012, Congress provided $675 million for firefighter assistance, including $337.5 million for AFG and $337.5 million for SAFER. Started in 2001, the fire grant program reached a high in 2009 when it had $985 million to distribute, but the amount appropriated has been declining since then.

FEMA personnel at the grant review meeting estimated that there was enough money available to fund approximately 10 percent of the applications this year, so most departments are going to be disappointed. FEMA hopes to begin rolling out grant notifications to the lucky few in September, if they can get the rest of them reviewed soon.

Typos, let us know HERE, and specify which article. Please read the commenting rules before you post a comment.

Author: Bill Gabbert

After working full time in wildland fire for 33 years, he continues to learn, and strives to be a Student of Fire.

One thought on “Thousands of FEMA fire grants, too little time”

  1. Nice article, Bill


    Define sr firefighters.

    I personally did this peer review in Crystal City, VA myself in 2005 with another EM.

    True not all FD or related get approval for these grants. It’s part of the process. Not everyone is going to be happy.

    What HAS to be remembered through these processes and the life of the grants(s)……..proper tracking of the item or piece of equipment, being expecting State or Federal ausits on the the tracking of the equipment, how it being used….through local or regional exercises, maintenance and training reqiuirements.

    Above all….when a community, jurisdiction, agency or otherwise… prepared…AFTER the life of the grant (3 to 5 years) HOW is the community going to maintain that equipment after the warranty wears off and do they have the proper line item funding in the jursdiction or agency to support those pieces of equipment after the grant…..THAT is the big question

    I have heard stories of communities thinking that these grant are saviors (and they are) BUT the full the full reality comes when those folks who “win” a grant are not aware or not fully informed of the issues after the word “grant” is done.

    There needs to be an understanding with everyone here just because you work til 6 PM on grants or have to “volunteer” your time after that…….now you fully realize the position of many Emergency Managers around the nation have to put up when they are salaried and do not get the big money that “Sr firefighters” get.

    Ask your local EM who has to wear three hats in a community (EM, tax assessor, veterans service office, etc) about what he has to do including these peer review trips..Sometimes we as peer reviewers do not have the total answer on how the Beltway Oz works and their selections on who does or does not get a grant.

    BUT I have a new appreciation on the way the process works and do not wonder why anymore, with limited funds nowadays, how this will or would shake out. ALSO I have no question, with limited funding….that some of this process can not sustain itself for the next 20+ yrs without some major legislation. WE were warned about this 7 yrs ago and now the full realization is coming forward and is or will not be a suprise

    You firefighters only got a taste of what many of us have been DOING for the last 10-12 yrs as this DHS / FEMA spoolup began. Enjoy the volunteer time…many a EM does that and doesn’t get any more pay for the extra duty!!


Comments are closed.