Congressmen hold hearing about Lassen National Park’s Reading Fire

Reading Fire, final perimeter
Reading Fire Lassen National Park
Reading Fire, August 7, 2012. Credit: Lassen NPS

Two Congressmen held an informal hearing in Sacramento on Wednesday to hear concerns about the Reading Fire that started in Lassen Volcanic National Park in northern California. The fire was not aggressively suppressed, and later escaped the park and burned 11,071 acres of US Forest Service land and 75 acres of privately owned land outside the boundaries.

Reading Fire, final perimeter
Final perimeter (in red) of the Reading Fire. The green line is the boundary of Lassen Volcanic National Park.

It started from lightning on July 23 and after about two weeks was only 95 acres while being managed for multiple objectives as a “fire for resource benefits”. Fire managers established a 700-acre box in which they intended to contain the fire by taking suppression action as needed to keep it from crossing the lines drawn on a map.

Reading Fire acres through August 12
Size of the Reading Fire through August 12

They were unsuccessful, and on August 6 it moved out of the park, ultimately burning 28,079 acres by the time it was contained on August 21. By August 23 the National Park Service had spent $15,875,495 observing, managing, and later suppressing the fire.

Some of the local residents said at the hearing that with the decline of the timber industry they now rely heavily on tourism. According to their testimony the fire had a negative impact on some of the local businesses during a critical time of the year for their revenue.

The list of government officials that testified at the hearing included:

  • U.S. representatives Wally Herger, R-Chico, and Tom McClintock, R-Granite Bay
  • Bill Kaage, the park service’s chief of the Branch of Wildland Fire
  • Andy McMurry, CAL FIRE’s statewide deputy director
  • Joseph Millar, director of Fire and Aviation Management for the US Forest Service’s Pacific Southwest Region
  • Rick Kyle, Shasta County Fire Warden
  • Steve Fitch, retired Forest Supervisor of the Shasta-Trinity National Forest

According to the Associated Press, Rep. Herger said:

The officials responsible for allowing the fire to burn during “a terrible fire season” should be removed and changes made to the national policy that uses managed wildfires as a tool to clear out forests and improve wildlife habitat.

Mr. Millar said in the hearing that the US Forest Service required all of their fires be aggressively suppressed last summer due to the severity of the fire season. However, the real reason may have been that the agency ran out of enough money to manage limited suppression fires for weeks or months.

CAL FIRE’s Andy McMurry testified that if the fire had started on state-protected lands they would have attempted to put it out immediately.

Retired Forest Supervisor Steve Fitch had earlier blasted the National Park Service for not aggressively suppressing the fire, saying:

I can’t believe they went ahead with letting a fire burn for the ecosystem’s benefit in a season that, for the entire nation, is record dry.

Of course with the benefit of hindsight, a person could assume that if the NPS had suppressed the fire when it was 1/4 acre, or two weeks later when it was 95 acres, it would not have spread outside the park and cost the taxpayers $25 million dollars, and would not have impacted the revenue the local businesses depend on in the summer.

The National Park Service has a mixed record when it comes to accepting accountability for serious mistakes. The Superintendent of Mount Rushmore National Memorial absolutely refused to do so in 2009 when protesters easily cruised through inadequate security measures to hang a huge banner over the sculpture. Superintendent Gerard Baker said:

Is it too bad it happened? Yes. Do I think it was my responsibility? Absolutely not. We did everything proper.

A few months later on the other hand, the acting Superintendent of Yosemite National Park Dave Uberuaga took full responsibility for the planned 90-acre prescribed fire that escaped and became the 7,425-acre Big Meadow fire:

I take full responsibility…I have apologized to the communities. I regret that we had to evacuate them. And I regret the situation we find ourselves in. Still, prescribed fire is a necessary tool in the park.

According to the Record-Searchlight, Lassen National Volcanic Park superintendent Darlene Koontz said in August that her agency apologizes for the “impacts” caused by the Reading fire.

NPS spokesperson Roberta D’Amico told Wildfire Today that the National Park Service has commissioned an interagency investigation which should be complete by mid-November. We will be anxious to see if the report concludes that the agency “did everything proper” in managing the Reading fire.

 

Thanks go out to Kelly

Author: Bill Gabbert

After working full time in wildland fire for 33 years, he continues to learn, and strives to be a Student of Fire. Google+

2 thoughts on “Congressmen hold hearing about Lassen National Park’s Reading Fire”

  1. Apparently folks at NPS were incapable of adjusting to the severity of conditions for 2012

    Apparently the same for USFS and Colorado State Forest Service this year, when their burn program was turned over to CO Dept of Public Safety.

    Apparently there need to be some sort of penalties for these type of occurences at high levels of decision making….how about 3 yrs back on the fire lines for those who purport policy as the all saving of the natural resources.

    Too much KoolAid being served about fuels reduction through the use of fire albeit much cheaper.

    BUT EVERY forester and fire tech in the field, this summer, ought to have known these very facts. Those in high level positions in LMA’s across the US this year who did not recognize this in as early as Jan 2012 ought to be demoted to a grade more commensurate with their abilities of “decisionmaking!!”

  2. Maybe a REVIEW of the S130/290/390 series is in order

    Somehow this has made it to the UCAR /COMET website.

    Maybe these upper echelon folks need acomplete review of every one of THEIR NWCG quals even before saying they are sorry to the public

    Saying you are sorry during the middle of fire seaon proves you are not serious nor humble about preaching any policy if you can not or will not reason to cancel RX burns or immediately extinguish fire in this fire season or up coming fire seasons that exhibit exceptional fire severity as this season did

    This coming from a former GS ENOP and ENGB and later a WG11 Aircraft Mechanic

    In the fire and aviation and even the weather world……..even I know as well as the other GS5-8’s KNEW what this was all about

    WE passed our S13- through 390 course….did our leaders and especially the ones espousing policy with a “background” shpuld have ID’d this looooong ago.

    Saying sorry this day in age….just doesn’t cut it even if one takes responsibility. Isn’t that all those CORE VALUES that all the LMA’s lecture upon???? You know Leadership, Humility, etc??

    Somehow those were missed as well a WX briefing!!

Comments are closed.