Wildfire aviation news, November 11, 2011

SEAT dumps retardant to avoid crash — twice

A single engine air tanker (SEAT) on two occasions in August had to dump part of its retardant load in order to avoid crashing. According to an article in the Missoulian, on August 27 an Air Tractor 802 was attempting to take off from the Ravalli County Airport at Hamilton, Montana (map) when it became evident that it was too heavy to lift off the runway. The pilot released 75 gallons of retardant on the last 75 feet of the runway, which lightened the aircraft enough to allow it to take off. The Hamilton Fire Department rinsed the retardant off the runway.

On August 30 an Air Tractor 802 had cleared the runway but was “in a negative rate of climb”, said Dean Bitterman, forest aviation officer for the Bitterroot National Forest. It was not going to make it over a hill, so pilot Jackie Shadowens released 75 gallons of retardant just north of the runway into grass and wetlands.

The SEAT can hold about 800 gallons of retardant, but had been downloaded by 20% to account for density altitude, which is affected by higher temperatures and altitude.

USFS extends air tanker availability to account for longer fire seasons

This winter for the first time in recent history, the U.S. Forest Service will have a large air tanker on contract through the winter. Butch Weedon reports that Neptune Aviation will have one of their large air tankers, probably a P2V, on contract through the 2011-2012 winter months. In addition, three air tankers will come on earlier next year than usual, on March 1, because the USFS expects the 2012 fire season to start early, as was the case this year.

Neptune still has three air tankers deployed in Texas. One P2V is in Austin and another is at Longview, where their new BAe-146 jet powered air tanker has been stationed for several weeks.

Columbia Helicopters has had one of its twin-rotor Columbia 107 helicopters on extended duty in east Texas, out of Huntsville, since March, under a State contract. Normally that helicopter would end its season in September, but they expect it to remain there until the end of the year, due to the high fire danger.

Other air tankers in Texas

The DC-10 very large air tanker was released from its Texas assignment around October 28, along with three Convair 580 air tankers from Canada.

The Rand air tanker report

The U.S. Forest Service is still not interested in offering exclusive use contracts for very large air tankers (VLAT) that carry 11,600 to 20,000 gallons, which is 6 to 11 times more retardant than the largest “large” air tankers with a capacity of 1,800 to 3,000 gallons. When the Rand Corporation conducted the air tanker study for the USFS, they were instructed by the USFS to not even consider VLATs. Here is a quote from a July, 2010 draft of the 104-page report which has still not been released to the public:

At Forest Service direction, we did not examine smaller SEATs that carry 800-900 gallons of retardant nor larger VLATs that carry 12,000-20,000 gallons of retardant.

Astounding, to say the least. The USFS paid Rand $840,092 for the report.

The draft version of the report recommends 11 to 28 3,000-gallon air tankers, and 14 to 20 2,700-gallon helicopters depending on how they are based, their mobility, and the “prescience” of dispatchers to be able to predict where fires will start. But those are only for initial attack. If the USFS plans to use the aircraft on large fires, they will need more, but the report did not provide a recommendation for that contingency. This year there were 11 large air tankers on exclusive use contracts.

Few people would recommend that air tankers not be used on large fires. And of course they are used routinely and extensively on large fires. For example, on the 6,200-acre Fourmile Canyon fire that burned west of Boulder, Colorado in September, air tankers dropped 86 loads of retardant over a four day period. Below is a map showing the locations of most, but not all, of the retardant drops by large air tankers on that fire. (Click on it to see a larger version.)Map of air tanker drops, Fourmile Canyon fire

 

Santa Maria air tanker base to reopen

Santa Maria air tanker base
Fire retardant tanks at Santa Maria air tanker base. Photo: Central Coast Jet Center

Since the staffing at the Santa Maria air tanker base 55 miles northwest of Santa Barbara, California was eliminated on March 19, 2009, which downgraded the staff to call when needed, several fire chiefs in the area have been campaigning to reinstate the full time positions at the base. At that time two key tanker base positions — fixed-wing base manager and assistant fixed-wing base manager — were eliminated as part of a reorganization of the Los Padres National Forest staff.

Today Peggy Hernandez, the Forest Supervisor announced that the appropriate staff will be on hand at Santa Maria from October 21 through November 15 of this year, and during next year’s declared fire season, to reload air tankers if there is a fire in the area.

The call when needed status meant that if there was a nearby fire on which air tankers were used, the aircraft had to fly to Paso Robles to reload with fire retardant, which is 58 miles north of Santa Maria. Without a full time staff, it can take several hours or perhaps much longer to round up personnel qualified and available to run the base at Santa Maria, and then the mechanical systems have to be put back into service. [Corrected to say Paso Robles instead of Porterville for the alternate base.]

Summerland-Carpenteria Fire Chief Michael Mingee, who serves as President of the Association of Santa Barbara Fire Chiefs, welcomed the announcement.

“This has been a great example of government agencies at all levels working in cooperation for the betterment of public safety,” Chief Mingee said.

Wildfire Today has covered this issue previously:

 

2 Pilots dead in separate wildfire aviation accidents in Spain

The International Association of Wildland Fire is reporting the deaths of two pilots in separate wildfire aviation accidents in Spain. One was a single engine air tanker that crashed on October 2, and the other was a mid-air collision of two helicopters on September 30. There was one fatality in each incident.

It has been a very bad year in Spain for wildfire aviation fatalities. Six firefighters died March 16 in the crash of a helicopter, and three died on September 19 in another helicopter accident.

Here is the information reported by the IAWF about the two most recent fatalities:

==================================================

INCIDENT #1

  • Name: Iñigo Zubiaga Padadogorriaga
  • Rank: Pilot
  • Age: 54
  • Gender: Male
  • Status: Contractor to the Airborne Firefighting Service of the Galician Regional Government (INFOCAM) (INFOGA)
  • Years of Service: Very experienced pilot and had flown the last four fire seasons in Galicia (Galice) Spain. He was a master of the Aeroclub of Biscay, and wrote a very popular manual for obtaining a private pilot’s license.
  • Date of Incident: 2 October 2011
  • Time of Incident: approximately 1715 hours local time
  • Date of Death: 2 October 2011
  • Company: Martínez Ridao Company
  • Fire Department: Airborne Firefighting Service of the Galician Regional Government (INFOCAM)
  • Incident Description: Pilot Zubiaga, was helping to extinguish a large fire in the Serra da Meda, Galicia near the town of Arcucelos (Laza). The plane he was piloting, an Air Tractor AT802, crashed for reasons still unknown but the pilot had time to radio his base that something was wrong with the aircraft. Nearby observers saw the “aircraft was on a strange maneuver before plunging to the ground.” Firefighters from Verín started an immediate search and when they found the aircraft the Zubiaga was not inside. He died of unknown causes and was found about 150 meters from the crashed aircraft in an area of rough terrain. His body was discovered about 1900 hours local time and was taken to the Hospital Complex of Ourense. An autopsy was to be performed to determine cause of death. The Regional Ministry of Rural Affairs announced an inquiry would take place concerning the incident.
  • Incident Location: Autonomous Community of Galicia, Ourense-Xunta de Galicia province, in Serrra da Meda, between Laza and Verín to 42.008999,-7.482033. Galicia (Galice) is in northwest Spain and is bordered by Portugal to the south, the Atlantic Ocean to the west and the Bay of Biscay to the north.
INCIDENT #2
  • Name: Leo Jenssen (from Denmark)
  • Rank: Pilot
  • Age: unknown
  • Gender: Male
  • Status: Contractor to the Airborne Firefighting Service of Castilla La Mancha Regional Government (Incendios Forestales Castilla La Mancha, INFOCAM)
  • Years of Service: More than 10700 flight hours and eight fire seasons in Spain
  • Date of Incident: 30 September 2011
  • Time of Incident: 1340 hours local time
  • Date of Death: 30 September 2011
  • Company: Grupo INAER
  • Company Address: Oficinas Centrales (INAER Helicópteros), Aeródromo de Mutxamel, Partida La Almaina, 92, 03110 Mutxamel, Alicante, SPAIN
  • Fire Department: Airborne Firefighting Service of the Castilla La Mancha Regional Government (Incendios Forestales Castilla La Mancha, INFOCAM)
  • Helicopter Contractor: Grupo INAER
  • Incident Description: Two helicopter Bell B212’s touched and crashed during aerial maneuvering to refill with water at the Bienservida reservoir. Pilot Jennsen (flying helicopter MSN 30775, CC-CIS) was the only one of the two pilots who died during the incident. The other pilot, Manuel Fuertes, with 13 years’ experience, (flying helicopter EC-GIC), survived with minor injuries and burns but walked away from the crash and was taken to the hospital in Ciudad Real. Pilot Jennsen was unconscious and with a pulse when extracted from the water and CPR was administered. Pilot Jennsen was pronounced dead at the hospital and reportedly died from drowning. He was working for INAER, for the Castilla La Mancha fire agency. The fire reported at 1245 hours local time was extinguished at only 6 ha. The Accident Investigation Commission and Civil Aviation Incidents (CIAIAC) of the Ministry of Development is responsible for the investigation. The helicopter had last undergone and passed a review on 22 September. At this time the cause of the accident is unknown.
  • Incident Location: Area known as Los Castellares in the Alcaraz Sierra, Autonomous Community of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete province, at the Bienservida reservoir, 38.519429,-2.61137. Spain.

Missoulian: the state of the air tanker fleet

Tanker 07, Whoopup fire
Tanker 07, a P2, on the Whoopup fire, July 18, 2011. Photo by Bill Gabbert

The Missoulian has an article about the current and future state of the air tanker fleet. Here is an excerpt:

Fighting fire from the air will remain a major tactic for the U.S. Forest Service, and the skies could start to get crowded soon.

“We want to have more than 11, but probably less than 44 large air tankers,” U.S. Forest Service national fire director Tom Harbour said in a recent interview with the Missoulian. “I think ultimately we’ll have between two and three dozen large air tankers.”

Eleven multi-engine retardant bombers remain under contract with the Forest Service, down from a fleet of 44 in 2004. Missoula-based Neptune Aviation has nine of those tankers, while Minden Air of Arizona has the other two.

“We’re looking all around to see what aircraft there are out there,” Harbour said. “We’re not doing any research in particular aircraft (within the Forest Service), but we’re interested in all designs. There are lots out there: old, new, big and little. And there are dozens of folks who have a particular platform they want to try. Neptune’s just been the first to take our criteria and put a plane in service.”

That would be Neptune’s new BAe-146 jet tanker, which won a short-term firefighting contract in September. The plane is the *first new model in nearly three decades to be certified for forest fire work. It is currently fighting fires in Texas.

Assuming the BAe passes additional field testing during the interim contract period, Neptune officials said they plan to phase in as many as 11 more jets as market conditions dictate.

Neptune CEO Kristen Nicholarsen said she’s heard of three or four companies developing retardant-dropping planes in pursuit of Forest Service contracts.

*Actually, the DC-10 and the 747 are aircraft models that are new to the air tanker fleet that have been certified by the Interagency Air Tanker Board in recent years.

 

Thanks go out to Dick

Questions and “answers” from the USFS about the air tanker program

Tanker 45, a P2, drops on the Whoopup fire, July 18, 2011
Tanker 45, a P2, drops on the Whoopup fire, July 18, 2011. Photo: Bill Gabbert

In 2002, two mid-air wing failures of large air tankers caused five deaths and resulted in the number of contracted air tankers being dramatically reduced by eliminating some of the oldest World War II era bombers that had been converted to air tankers. At that time we had 44. Today there are 11 on standard exclusive use contracts. Even after five studies since 1995 about the future of the air tanker fleet, the U.S. Forest Service still has not made a decision about the future of the program and how to reconstitute the fleet.

On May 19, 2011, the Chief of the Forest Service, Tom Tidwell, spoke on the issue in a Senate hearing:

[Senator Lisa] MURKOWSKI: What is the strategy for — for replacement of the aging air tanker fleet? And where do you see that going?

TIDWELL: Well, I was hoping to have that completed by now. But the RAND Corporation that’s doing the study for us have not completed their work. We’re hoping to get that here in the next month or so. And so once we receive that, that’ll probably be the last piece of information we need to move forward with our strategy.

Chief Tidwell was referring to the Rand Corporation study that was due in January, 2011. There are reports that the USFS has received it and it is heavy in its recommendations for scooper-type air tankers. But there is a strong bias against that type of air tanker within the higher levels of the USFS. So they are going to pay for still another study, probably hoping that this next one will give them the answer that they want. The USFS paid Rand $840,092. It is unknown what this next study will cost the taxpayers.

At another Senate hearing June 14, 2011, Chief Tidwell said:

In the next 10 years more than half of our large air tankers will need to be replaced and we are studying the options and will be making a recommendation to you by the end of the summer.

We are now well past the June-July and “end of the summer” deadlines promised by Chief Tidwell.

We submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on September 19, 2011 to obtain a copy of the Rand study, but we have not yet received it.

On September 23 we submitted some questions to the USFS about the future of the air tanker program. Yesterday we received the reply below from spokesperson Jennifer Jones.

Unfortunately, question number 6 was not answered. Is the USFS going to wait until this next report I’ll call “Rand Revisited” is received to make decisions about what recommendations to make to Congress? For such an important issue, and one that has languished for almost 10 years, it is inconceivable that the USFS still does not have a plan, or even a time line to develop one. Or, if there is a time line, why it is secret. Continued dithering and indecisiveness by the U. S. Forest Service is not acceptable.

The “answers” to our questions, as provided by the U. S. Forest Service, are in italics.

=================================================================

This web site, dated August 15, 2011, says the USFS intended to award a non-competitive contract to the Rand Corporation for another study, Rand’s second study, about the air tanker and helicopter situation.

Questions:

1. Is the amount of the contract $7 million? If not, what is the amount?

Due to the responses received expressing interest in this contract, the U.S. Forest Service decided to withdraw its sole source determination.  A competitive acquisition will be conducted.  There is no fixed amount for the contract.  Bidders will submit prices and the price will depend on who is awarded the contract.  Price is one of the factors that will be considered during the contract award process.  There currently is no contract in place.  The government develops an Independent Government Estimate that is used during the evaluation of cost proposals.  The contract value will be identified at the time of contract award. 

2. What are the deliverables, and what is the due date?

The deliverables are still being finalized and will be identified/included in the Statement of Work or the Specification that is included in the Solicitation.  A due date will be negotiated with whoever is awarded the contract.  Often times delivery due dates are identified in the Statement of Work or the Specification; however, it is also possible that the U.S. Forest Service may opt to allow interested offerors to propose delivery dates in their proposal or to negotiate with the successful offeror after award. 

3. What was the product of Rand’s earlier contract to study the air tanker issue? Was their product satisfactory? If not, why not?

The product of the earlier contract included an evaluation and an analysis of the U.S. Forest Service aviation program to determine the optimum mix of helicopter and airtanker assets; a forecast of the agency’s future needs for these aviation assets; and a cost/benefit analysis of the helicopter and airtanker options.  The product was satisfactory; however the final analysis requires refinement due to inadequacies in input data. 

4. Why is another contract being awarded for this issue, right after Rand’s other contract?

Additional research is needed to assist the U.S. Forest Service in determining the appropriate composition of a mix of fixed-wing airtanker and helicopter/water scooper aviation assets that optimizes the public’s return on investments in wildfire suppression.

5, What was the amount of money paid to Rand for the earlier contract?

$840,092.00

6. When will the USFS make a decision about the long term management of the large air tanker fleet? It was promised by the end of the summer, 2011.

The U.S. Forest Service is committed to modernizing the Large Airtanker fleet.  The agency is currently developing a strategy to modernize the Large Airtanker fleet in coordination with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and the Office of Management and Budget and plans to submit it to Congress as soon as it is completed.

 

Very old and very new air tankers

Tanker 40 dropping in Newton Co TX
Tanker 40 dropping in Newton County Texas, posted October 3, 2011 on the official Facebook page of the Office of the Governor of Texas (click to enlarge)

Two very different air tankers are in the news, a very old one and the newest air tanker to join the federal fleet. Above is a photo, posted October 3, 2011 on the “Office of the Governor of Texas” Facebook page, of Neptune’s Tanker 40, a jet-powered BAe-146, making one of its first drops on an actual fire. The aircraft is not new, having entered service in 1986, but it was just recently converted into an air tanker. It least it is newer than the other air tankers currently flying that are 40 to 60 years old. The first P2s were manufactured in 1945 and the military retired their last one in 1984.

The photo below of a TBM dropping on a fire in 1972 is included here because a TBM is also in the news. The nonprofit Museum of Mountain Flying in Missoula has purchased one of the last TBM air tankers still flying and will be displaying it in their hanger at the Missoula International Airport. It is scheduled to arrive at Missoula today, October 10. [UPDATE: the TBM arrived in Missoula at noon on October 10. Photos and more information are at the Missoulian site.]

TBM air tanker dropping Vista fire
TBM air tanker dropping on the Vista fire, San Bernardino National Forest in Southern California, 1972. Photo by Bill Gabbert, Wildfire Today

Here is an excerpt from an October 8 article in the Missoulian about the TBM:

Dick Komberec can’t wait for Monday.

Barring weather or mechanical complications, that’s when a long-ago thoroughbred from the Johnson Flying Service slurry bomber fleet returns home to Missoula.

It’s a retrofitted World War II torpedo bomber – “TBM,” to guys like Komberec who flew them as sprayers and fire bombers for Bob Johnson from 1954 to 1973.

The airplane is flying, with a seasoned Canadian pilot at the helm, from New Brunswick, where it and dozens of its brethren served as sprayers and fire retardant planes at Forest Protection Limited for most of the past 40 years. But when it touches ground at the Missoula International Airport, it’ll be Missoula’s again.

The nonprofit Museum of Mountain Flying used a generous gift to buy the plane for an undisclosed but rock-bottom price. It’ll take its place inside the hangar among nine other pioneering mountain planes, including the centerpiece DC-3 that dropped smokejumpers to their deaths in the tragic Mann Gulch fire in 1949. That plane flew back to Missoula in October 2001.

“It’s an historic event for Missoula and the whole state of Montana, really,” said Stan Cohen, the museum board’s president. “It’s not as historic as the Mann Gulch airplane, but it’ll be the only Johnson TBM on display in the U.S.”

Plans are to house “Alpha 13” in the museum hangar, restore its Johnson Flying Service orange and white colors and, perhaps, take it for a spin now and then or do some demonstration water drops.

Other articles on Wildfire Today about Tanker 40 and the BAe-146.

Thanks go out to Bill M. and Dick