National 30-minute wildfire response law faces debate

US wildland fire agencies would be required to respond to wildfires within 30 minutes and deploy within three hours if the Wildfire Response and Preparedness Act is signed into law.

The mandated response time was described as a “commonsense” measure by Republican Rep. Tom Tiffany from Wisconsin, who is also the Chair of the House Committee on Natural Resources, at the committee’s hearing on the act on Wednesday afternoon.

“Many would be shocked to learn that no such standardized response time exists across federal agencies right now,” Tiffany said. “Instead, decisions about initial attack are left up to subjective factors that vary across agencies, regions, and individuals. Aggressive initial attacks are critical to preventing fires from developing into large, uncontrollable blazes that spread devastation.”

United States Forest Service Deputy Chief John Crockett said the Service supports the intent of the law and shares the goal of improving federal response to wildfires as a witness at Wednesday’s hearing. He also said the Service plans to have 11,300 firefighters for the 2026 wildfire season, which some lawmakers worry would be extreme due to low amounts of snowpack across the West.

But the nation’s current wildland fire workforce isn’t strong enough to meet the new 30-minute response standard, according to wildland firefighter advocacy group Grassroots Wildland Firefighters. The group said multiple systemic issues need to first be addressed before Congress sets sweeping response-time mandates.

“Response standards must be grounded in reality—and paired with investments in a sustainable wildfire workforce,” the group said in a social media post. “The biggest constraint in federal wildfire response today isn’t policy—it’s people. Chronic staffing shortages, high vacancy rates, and retention challenges already strain resources during peak fire season. Terrain, remoteness, detection delays, and aviation limitations further complicate rapid response, especially in remote federal lands.”

Click here to read the group’s full response to the proposed legislation.

Help reduce cancer in the fire service

January is Firefighter Cancer Awareness Month in the United States. Follow in the footsteps of tens of thousands of US firefighters who are making an impact on firefighter health and safety. Join the NIOSH National Firefighter Registry (NFR) for Cancer.

All US firefighters can join the NFR for Cancer, whether you are paid or volunteer, active or retired, and even if you don’t have cancer. When you join, you will answer questions about your fire service history and help NIOSH fill an important gap in our knowledge about cancer in firefighters.

The more we know about cancer in the US fire service, the more we can do to prevent it.

Take 5 minutes to start your registration at NFR.CDC.gov.

US Wildland Fire Service launched, despite lack of funding and without majority of nation’s firefighting resources

The United States Department of the Interior on Monday officially announced the launch of the “U.S. Wildland Fire Service,” an effort by the department to unify the wildfire-fighting resources of numerous agencies.

Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum first announced the department’s intent to establish the new service in September as a continuation of President Donald Trump’s executive order in June, which directed all agencies represented by the National Interagency Fire Center to enhance their wildland firefighting capabilities. The new Service will consolidate all department sub-agencies’ wildland firefighting forces, including those in the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The Service already faces financial and legislative hurdles. A group of both Democratic and Republican lawmakers effectively blocked the service from being funded in a new appropriations bill package. The bills included $0 for the U.S. Wildland Fire Service, despite the Department requesting around $6.5 billion for the agency’s wildland fire operations. The lawmakers also specifically said they don’t agree with the administration’s consolidation efforts in a recent press release.

“The bill does not endorse the consolidation of federal wildland firefighting into one agency as proposed in President Trump’s budget request,” a press release from the United States Senate Committee on Appropriations’ Democratic members said. “Instead, it specifically provides funding to continue wildland firefighting using the longstanding practice of funding both the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of the Interior to allow Congress to consider legislative proposals for such a major change.”

Monday’s announcement did not mention the funding discrepancy.

The new Service’s name is also a bit of a misnomer, as the vast majority of the nation’s wildland firefighting resources won’t be included in the Service. More than two-thirds of those resources are managed by the United States Forest Service, which will be excluded from the new U.S. Wildland Fire Service. Lawmakers have officially signaled their desire for the Forest Service to eventually become part of the Wildland Fire Service, but such a consolidation would need an act of Congress.

Click here to read the Department of the Interior’s full order announcing the new Service’s establishment.

USFS to standardize post-fire recovery programs, scrutinize current projects

The USDA Forest Service plans to standardize post-fire recovery actions nationwide.

The Service will soon be launching a nationwide environmental assessment to analyze the effects of general post-fire recovery actions, issues, and alternatives to facilitate consistency, officials said in a press release on Thursday. The Service would then standardize its programs across the nation’s forests to allow for a more “rapid, efficient, and effective response” from local managers.

Officials said a review of the agency’s post-fire recovery programs was necessary due to the increasing severity and frequency of wildfires across the country, especially in Western states. It also aligns with executive orders issued by President Donald Trump, which focus on streamlining wildland fire response and increasing timber production through deregulation.

“Restoring forests after a wildfire is not something we can delay, especially when public safety is at stake,” Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz said in a press release. “Post-fire recovery actions need to be immediate and comprehensive to protect the future of our forests and the people who depend on them.” 

The Service’s environmental analysis would specifically focus on the following issues:

  • Effects to wildlife and habitat, including threatened, endangered or sensitive species
  • Effects to waterways and soils resulting from fire suppression and response activities
  • Effects to public access, recreation, and visual quality through temporary closures during hazard treatment
  • Economic effects of post-fire timber salvage

“This effort is about resilience,” Chief Schultz said. “We’re not just recovering from a fire. We’re building landscapes that can withstand the next one.” 

Officials expect the assessment to be completed by April, with site-specific scoping, documentation, and decisions being issued on a project-by-project basis by local rangers. Members of the public can comment on the Service’s proposal through Jan. 26 at 11:59 p.m. EST. Click here to submit a comment on the proposal.

‘Wildland Fire Service’ consolidation effort stalled pending further study

Night operations on the Pine Gulch Fire in Colorado. Photo by Kyle Miller, Wyoming Hotshots, USFS firefighters hotshots

Congress just unveiled a new package of bills to fund some agencies and avert a full government shutdown at the end of January. The package includes a specific push back against the Trump administration’s attempt to consolidate the nation’s wildland fire resources.

The U.S. Department of the Interior and the U.S. Department of Agriculture unveiled plans in 2025 for the formation of the U.S. Wildland Fire Service in September, with the goal of having the Service operational by the end of January. The formation of the new Service followed an executive order issued by President Donald Trump demanding that the nation’s wildfire fighting forces be consolidated under a single agency.

Those efforts appear to have stalled after both Democratic and Republican lawmakers blocked that order and opted to maintain the current wildland firefighting structure in their new funding bills. The bill package continues funding allocations for wildland firefighting services to the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of the Interior’s individual agencies.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, in September, announced the “unification” of department sub-agencies’ wildland firefighting forces, including the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, under the U.S. Wildland Fire Service as part of the Wildland Fire Management Program.

But that unification did not include the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service, which has more than two-thirds of the nation’s firefighting resources. Lawmakers said such a consequential change would need congressional scrutiny before it’s approved.

“The bill does not endorse the consolidation of federal wildland firefighting into one agency as proposed in President Trump’s budget request,” a press release from the United States Senate Committee on Appropriations’ Democratic members said. “Instead, it specifically provides funding to continue wildland firefighting using the longstanding practice of funding both the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of the Interior to allow Congress to consider legislative proposals for such a major change.”

The Committee also directed Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum to contract with an independent and non-partisan research organization to conduct a study to find out how feasible Trump’s proposed consolidation of wildland fire management operations is. The study would specifically focus on the effects on timber targets, cohesion between wildland fire management and hazardous fuel reduction programs, and how the new Service would differ from the National Interagency Fire Center.

Long-term health scars left by LA’s historic wildfires

The fires have been long extinguished, but the health effects of Los Angeles’ destructive 2025 wildfires are still living on one year later.

The Palisades, Eaton, Hurst, Kenneth, Hughes and Sepulveda fires killed 440 people, destroyed nearly 16,000 homes, and burned more than 55,000 acres of land from Jan. 7 through February. The Palisades Fire alone caused an estimated $51.7 billion worth of home damage, according to a July analysis from Redfin.

LA residents are dealing with not just the emotional toll of the tragedy on its anniversary, but the physical toll as well, according to health experts from the University of California, Los Angeles. Residents’ lungs, in particular, face ongoing health challenges.

“Many individuals who followed up with me six months later also mentioned their symptoms flared with the fires,” UCLA Health pulmonologist and associate clinical professor May-Lin Wilgus said in a recent article posted by the university. “These patients often had continued exposures — such as returning to smoke-damaged homes or encountering high levels of heavy-metal contamination — so it does seem to be a trigger.”

A study published in December by LA’s Smidt Heart Institute and other researchers found that more severe forms of illness presented early in some susceptible LA residents, including excess emergency encounters for not only pulmonary illness and acute myocardial infarction. But, less severe effects have persisted or started to present with delayed timing, including increased systemic illness through blood chemistry laboratory abnormalities.

“Systemic health effects are not often reported in post wildfire outcomes studies, perhaps because they are not easily detected or because they are associated more with WUI than wildland-only fire exposures,” the research said. “Indeed, the smoke produced by WUI compared with wildland-only fires is known to contain not only a more complex aggregate of volatile and semi-volatile chemical constituents but also toxic metals, which may alter the epigenetic profiles of immune cells with broad tissue distribution in exposed individuals.”

Dr. Wilgus advised communities to start preparing for the next major wildfire now to lessen future adverse health effects, including using high-quality air filters, creating evacuation plans, and storing an emergency go-bag with food, water and medications.

“We have a very wide network of pulmonology clinics throughout the region, where we are treating patients who may have been affected,” Dr. Wilgus said. “Throughout Los Angeles, we need to be more aware and prepared, as well as support ongoing research to help reduce these impacts.”

Wildland firefighters with cancer can now get $450K from the US government

Wildland firefighters who have been diagnosed with or killed by a smoke-related cancer are now eligible for a nearly $450,000 payment from the federal government.

The Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act, passed as one of the many parts of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act by President Donald Trump on Thursday, covers around 20 different “exposure-related” cancers under the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits program, which provides benefits to federal, state, and local officials who are killed or injured in the line of duty. Before the law, firefighters were generally only covered by the program if they were physically injured in the line of duty or died from heart attacks, strokes, or mental health conditions like PTSD.

Eligible wildland firefighters can get a one-time tax-free payment of $448,575, the max benefit for the program in Fiscal Year 2025, and four years of higher education financial support for their children or spouse. Families of wildland firefighters who have died within the last six years are also eligible for the benefits.

Firefighters must meet the following criteria to be eligible for the benefits:

  • The firefighter’s exposure occurred while they were engaged in the line of duty
  • The firefighter began serving in the position no fewer than 5 years before the diagnosis or death
  • The firefighter was diagnosed with cancer not more than 15 years after their last date of active service
  • The cancer directly results in death or permanent and total disability of the firefighter

Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) co-sponsored the legislation with Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) in honor of Michael Paidar, a St. Paul fire captain who died of an aggressive form of Acute Myeloid Leukemia on August 26, 2020, while still working for the fire department, the senator said in a press release.

“This is a critical victory for our firefighters who put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe, and for their loved ones,” Klobuchar said in the press release. “This bipartisan legislation will ensure that the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Program covers service-related cancers—honoring the commitment we make to our firefighters like Captain Paidar and other first responders who made the ultimate sacrifice.”

Eligible firefighters can apply for the benefits on the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits program website. Click here to access it.

Idaho to ‘double’ logging efforts under new USFS wildfire agreement

Sheep Fire INL smoke fire

The United States Forest Service announced a new wildfire risk reduction agreement with Idaho officials on Friday that will, in part, double the state’s current timber production.

The USFS and Idaho committed to increasing an annual sustainable timber sale volume of up to 100 million board feet within five years, which would be double the state’s current output, according to a press release from the Service. Officials said the agreement supports President Donald Trump’s Expansion of Timber Production Executive Order to increase timber harvests on national forests by 25% by 2028.

“For too long, federal red tape and hands-off policies left our forests overgrown and our communities at risk,” U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said in the press release. “By doubling timber production through Good Neighbor Authority and speeding up active management, we’re protecting Idaho families, supporting rural jobs, and making our forests stronger for generations to come.”

Idaho Governor Brad Little previously signed his own “Make Forests Healthy Again Act” executive order in April to increase collaboration between the state and federal government for the purpose of wildfire reduction and general forest management.

The governor held a press conference announcing the new agreement on Friday, calling the agreement essential to meeting the “forest health crisis” on federally owned land.

“Years of inadequate management have led to millions of acres of forest service lands becoming high-risk for insects, disease, and wildfires,” Little said at the press conference. “Idahoans are tired of megafires, endless smoke, and soaring suppression costs. We have a rare opportunity to shift the trajectory.”

The increased logging may face legal hurdles. Multiple conservation groups in nearby Montana recently sued the USFS over a logging road project on their state’s border with Idaho, according to BYU-Idaho Radio. The Beaverhead-Deer Lodge National Forest recently signed off on a new project to burn trees and put new logging roads in the Continental Divide, which the groups say will inflict unnecessary danger to local wildlife, including endangered grizzly bears and sage grouse.

USFS far behind usual hazardous fuel treatments nationwide, due to DOGE cuts

American Elk prescribed fire Wind Cave National Park

Grassroots Wildland Firefighters, an advocacy organization made up of current and former federal firefighters, recently published a new analysis showing that the U.S. Forest Service, under the President Donald Trump Administration, has massively reduced hazardous fuel treatments.

The analysis found hazardous fuel reduction work across National Forest lands was down 38% in 2025 compared with the same period over the previous four years, according to the analysis. Fuel reductions between June and August were barely half of what it was compared to previous summers.

Mitigation work was the furthest behind schedule in Idaho and Montana, where fewer than 30% of average treated acres have been managed in 2025. Oregon, Washington, California, and Nevada all fall under 40% while Arizona and New Mexico barely surpass half of the amount of land mitigated in recent years.

The organization blamed the personnel and budget cuts to the USFS that Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, made at the start of the new administration. Around 6,000 United States Department of Agriculture employees were terminated on Feb. 13 before an independent federal court ordered the department to rehire all 6,000 employees a month later. Grassroots previously told Wildfire Today that around 75% of the temporarily terminated employees had secondary wildland fire duties.

Grassroots said the USFS’s recent assurances that the Service is fully staffed are contradicted by the reality.

“Funding cuts have already led to a steep drop-off in forest mitigation projects across the West,” said Bobbie Scopa, a retired firefighter with 45 years of experience and Executive Secretary of the Grassroots Wildland Firefighters. “This is basic work that must be done, year after year. Without the prescribed burns, fuel break and fireline construction, and brush clearing that the firefighters rely on, wildfires will be harder to contain, and our firefighters and communities will be at greater risk.”

Click here to read the full analysis.

Protecting US federal lands is central to the national wildfire crisis 

Labor is the key resource to tackling wildfires says Bob Roper. August 2025 Lake Fire in the Modoc National Forest. Photo: CalFire

By Bob Roper

Wildland firefighters are facing a formidable battle, coping with labor shortages during one of the most intense fire seasons in recent years. As a California firefighter for over 45 years — including 15 years as Ventura County Fire Protection District chief and Nevada State Forester — I know firsthand that when it comes to stopping the spread of wildfires, there is no replacement for a well-trained and equipped firefighting force.  

But it takes more than a quick and skilled response to prevent a wildfire catastrophe. We also need to prioritize wise management of federal lands.  

As Californians in San Luis Obispo County are currently witnessing this summer, wildfires that start on state/federal lands can quickly spread to surrounding areas, threatening many lives, damaging health, destroying homes and businesses, and devastating communities. While wildfires on federal lands only make up approximately one-fifth of the total wildfires recorded across the country, they are typically responsible for nearly half the acres burned.  

I applaud the lawmakers who are working to address the workforce gaps by ensuring adequate funding for hiring, training, and support. As they do so, I ask them to make it part of a holistic approach to wildfire prevention and response. This is paramount if we want to truly address the worsening wildfire crisis. 

Why are wildfires burning so much of our federal land? One reason is that under current regulations, federal land management policies and environmental clearances make wildfire prevention arduous and sometimes impracticable. For example, formulating and conducting prescribed burns takes time, and needed labor resources are in short supply.  Additionally, electric grid operators and electrical workers cannot easily gain access to powerlines and other infrastructure on federal lands. We need to reduce the unnecessary challenges to perform vegetation management and other wildfire risk management activities. Without success, this means that our federal lands — and our people — are left more vulnerable. 

These fires cause enormous human suffering. Clouds of harmful smoke can travel thousands of miles to neighboring states and linger in the air for weeks. This contaminated air can be dangerous for Americans with pre-existing health issues and can even trigger cardiovascular and lung health issues. It also impacts the health of our first responders who are battling these wildfires. As policymakers look to improve our wildfire preparedness and response, protecting firefighters from the adverse health risks of wildfire smoke needs to be a part of effective policy solutions.  

Along with the health impacts, we are all too familiar with the financial cost. Wildfires already cost the United States between $394 and $893 billion annually due to property and capital losses along with insurance and liability costs. A new report from Gallagher estimated that the two wildfires that impacted much of Los Angeles County in January will cost $65 billion in economic losses. During my years as a firefighter, I’ve seen businesses crumble from wildfires and struggle to get back on their feet and cope with the combined property and wage losses.  

With more than 4,000 wildfires already recorded and 3.7 million acres burned this year alone, we need Congress and federal agencies to take action and help address this crisis. For starters, the President’s June Executive Order aims to create a more effective wildfire response through the U.S. Wildland Fire Service (USWFS). It is encouraging to see the Administration take actions to increase collaboration and efficiency, but sufficient resources for first responders will be crucial to the success of USWFS.   

Additionally, the House and Senate should pass the bipartisan Fix Our Forests Act. This much-needed step from Congress will help improve federal land management and coordination across federal, state, and local authorities. But this legislation is just one piece of a much larger, national wildfire strategy. We also need to address labor shortages among wildland firefighters and ensure that state and local partners have the resources needed to train and recruit skilled individuals. 

As a country, we cannot continue to approach wildfires with the same patchwork of solutions that have been in place for decades. Let’s take decisive and comprehensive actions to keep our families and our communities safe from the growing wildfire threat.  

Bob Roper is the Senior Wildfire Policy Advisor for the Western Fire Chiefs Association. He has been in the fire service for over 45 years, starting as a volunteer firefighter and then rising to executive positions. He served in the Ventura County Fire District for 34 years, the last 15 as Fire Chief and as the Nevada State Forester.