Water pollution lasts for years after a wildfire burns, new research shows

Beach Fire Lake Havasu City

Contaminants from wildfires can create long term water quality concerns in areas far from the fire-impacted zones as drifting smoke plumes and rainfall runoff challenge standard water filtration techniques.

A recently published analysis of 23 studies across 28 watersheds determined that the concentrations of numerous pollutants in waterways experienced significant increases for five years after a wildfire burns. Researchers found that the presence of heavy metals and other toxic chemical compounds in affected bodies of water was up to 66,000-fold above environmental standards.

“Most wildfires leave behind a barren, blackened landscape, and within this changed environment, important impacts can leave their mark,” the researchers said in a piece published in The Conversation. “Streams, rivers and water reservoirs receive a sudden pulse of ash, sediment and fire-suppressant chemicals washed off the land. For communities that depend on those waters for drinking water, wildfires can quickly become a long-term water-quality problem.”

The extent of water contamination depended on numerous factors, including burn severity, the types of soil and vegetation present, and how close the burned area was to nearby streams and reservoirs. But, the researchers also found that water contamination can extend far past where a fire burned. They looked data from watersheds in Canada, the US, Australia and Portugal.

Most of the toxic chemicals produced during wildfires are transported to nearby waterways during runoff from rain and other precipitation, but the study determined that smoke plumes also transport compounds to other water sources distant from the fire’s perimeter. One of the studies analyzed by researchers said certain toxic chemicals were transported 54 miles from a wildfire, while another study said waterways over 400 miles away could be contaminated by smoke plumes.

“Conventional treatments, such as coagulation and flocculation, sedimentation, rapid sand filtration, and, occasionally, granular activated carbon adsorption, are not designed to handle simultaneous spikes in turbidity, organic matter, trace metals, and other wildfire-derived contaminants, resulting in health risks to the inhabitants.”

“Unlike direct runoff from burned areas, the combined mechanism of atmospheric deposition followed by hydrological transport in unburned watersheds remains poorly quantified,” the researchers said in the analysis. “Despite their long-term persistence and toxicity, post-wildfire concentration variations of trace metals, PAHs, POPs, and WFFCs have not been studied extensively, especially concerning their persistence in sediments and possible remobilization, indicating that further research is required to understand their long-term effects on surface water bodies and aquatic environments.”

Click here to read the full analysis.

Safely training the tactical athlete

Firefighters Apple Fire

Above: Firefighters on the Apple Fire, March 28, 2012. Photo by Bill Gabbert.

Today we are reprising a second article from our archives about heat related injuries and extreme physical exertion among wildland firefighters.

As we reported in the first Throwback Thursday article, Dr. Brent Ruby, who has studied firefighters as they worked on fires, said regarding the 2011 hyperthermia fatality on the CR 337 fire in Texas:

The lessons learned from this research clearly indicate that the best protection against a heat injury is reducing work rate.

Aggressive hydration strategies are over-preached and may provide a false sense of protection. It should be emphasized that the autopsy report as described in the fatality report indicated no signs of dehydration or electrolyte imbalance.

With that in mind, below is the article we wrote in 2016 after reports were released on two very serious injuries that occurred during the first two days of training for new firefighters.

****

Safely training the tactical athlete

EMTAfter reading the Facilitated Learning Analysis (FLA) about the Rhabdomyolysis (Rhabdo) injury that occurred May 2, 2016 in South Dakota on the first day of the fire season after running for more than nine miles before doing uphill sprints, I started thinking about, not so much WHAT happened, but how to prevent similar serious injuries.

A couple of weeks before the Rhabdo case, on April 19 a wildland firefighter in the Northwest suffered a heat stroke while running on day 2 of their season. The employee was unconscious for several hours and spent four days in the hospital.

Both of these exercise-induced conditions can be life-threatening; 33 percent percent of patients diagnosed with Rhabdo develop a quick onset of kidney failure, and 8% of all cases are fatal.

Heat stroke can also kill, according to Medscape:

When therapy is delayed, the mortality rate may be as high as 80%; however, with early diagnosis and immediate cooling, the mortality rate can be reduced to 10%.

These two very serious incidents in a two week period that occurred at the beginning of the fire season should be a wakeup call for agencies employing wildland firefighters.

I am not a medical or exercise specialist, but neither were any of the four members of the South Dakota Rhabdo FLA team. It was comprised of a District Fire Management Officer, a Natural Resources Specialist, an Assistant Superintendent on a Hotshot crew, and an Assistant Fire Engine Operator.

A person might expect that for an exercise-induced injury that is fatal in eight percent of the cases, a medical expert and an exercise physiologist would be members of the team. The FLA concentrated on recognizing symptoms of Rhabdo, which is good. Firefighters need to be be informed, again, about what to look for. But the necessity of treating the symptoms could be avoided if the condition was prevented in the first place.

Prevention was not addressed in the document, except to mention availability of water. Dehydration isn’t the leading cause of Rhabdo, which is caused by exertion, but it can be a contributing factor.

With two life-threatening medical conditions on firefighting crews in a two-week period that occurred during mandatory exercise on day one and two of training, medical and exercise professionals perhaps could have evaluated what caused the injuries, and suggested how to design and implement a physical fitness program that would lessen the chances of killing firefighters on their first or second day on the job. But the LEARNING opportunity of the FLA was squandered.

The wildland fire agencies are not alone in hiring people off the streets and throwing them into a very physically demanding job. The military does this every day, as do high school athletic programs. There is probably a large body of research that has determined how to turn a person into an athlete without putting their lives in danger.

While the three firefighters and the natural resources specialist I’m sure meant well and did the best they could to write the FLA within the limits of their training and experience, the firefighting agencies need to get serious about a professional level exercise training program. After all, they are employing TACTICAL ATHLETES.

This issue is serious enough that the NWCG (since there is no National Wildland Firefighting Agency) should hire an exercise physiologist who can design, implement, and monitor a program for turning people off the street into tactical firefighting athletes.